Key Takeaways
- Better quality, higher rank: 1328 on the Arena text-to-image board — 67 points above Nano Banana 2 and 80 above Nano Banana Pro; 1428 on image editing, also ahead of both
- Google’s image output price is halved: image output drops from $60 to $30 per 1M tokens, but input rises from $0.50 to $1.50, and a 4K image now uses 3780 tokens instead of 2520
- Two billing modes on APIYI: $0.05 per request (same for 1K / 2K / 4K), or token-based at $0.66 input / $13.2 output per 1M tokens — about $0.021–$0.033 for a 1K image in production
- Simple rule: token-based is cheaper for 1K / 2K; per-request is cheaper for 4K
- Migration notes: no 512px; the model thinks by default and thinking tokens count toward output cost; Nano Banana 2 stays available at the same price
Background
In February 2026, Google released Nano Banana 2 (gemini-3.1-flash-image), delivering near-Pro quality at Flash-level speed and cost. It quickly became one of the most used image models on APIYI.
On October 6, Google released its upgrade, Nano Banana 2.1, with model ID gemini-nano-banana-2.1, generally available from day one. Google’s docs position it as the primary workhorse for image generation and recommend it for all new projects.
Note that Google’s deprecation table currently lists no shutdown date for gemini-3.1-flash-image; it only names 2.1 as the recommended replacement. Some articles online claim Nano Banana 2 will shut down on October 29, which does not match Google’s table — go by the official one.
Deep Dive
Benchmarks
The figures below come from the public Arena (formerly LMArena) leaderboards as of 2026-10-06. 2.1 has only just been listed, so it has fewer votes and its scores are still preliminary:
What this means:
- 2.1 beats Google’s own Pro on both boards, ending the pattern where the value model trailed the flagship on quality
- OpenAI’s
gpt-image-2.5models still top the boards; text-to-image ranks 4–6 (MAI-Image-2.6, Nano Banana 2.1, Grok Imagine 2.0) overlap within their error margins and are effectively one tier - 2.1’s edge is the lowest price at this quality level: 4K for $0.05 per request
Key Features
Quality and text rendering
Better visual quality and in-image text accuracy, with the previous version’s tiling artifacts fixed
Multi-turn consistency
Characters and scenes stay steadier across conversational edits, with up to 4 character references
Three thinking levels
minimal / medium / high, default medium; the previous version had only minimal / high
Multi-reference fusion
Up to 10 object references + 4 character references + 3 style references
Specs vs. Nano Banana 2
Three details from our own tests
We ran about 30 requests on our production gateway on 2026-10-07:- It thinks by default: even with no thinking parameter, each request produces about 530–960
thoughtsTokenCount, plus roughly 230–400 non-image output tokens. All of it counts toward output cost, so estimating from image tokens alone underestimates the cost by 20%–40%. Settinghighadds only about 30% more thinking tokens, roughly +6% for a 4K image. - No 512:
"imageSize": "512"returns 400 (not billed). If your Nano Banana 2 code uses 512, change it to1Kbefore switching. - Sizes differ from the previous version: without
aspectRatio, the model picks a ratio based on the content (mostly 16:9 for scenes, 2:3 or 3:4 for posters). 8:1 at 1K is 2928×352, versus 3072×384 on Nano Banana 2. Don’t reuse the old size table for front-end layout.
Practical Use
Recommended scenarios
- E-commerce and marketing assets: posters, product shots and banners with text, where the text rendering gains show most
- Multi-turn editing: start with a draft and refine it step by step, with better character and scene consistency
- Bulk 4K output: $0.05 per request regardless of resolution, so the more 4K you generate, the better the deal
- Images that need live data: attach Google Search for weather cards or market charts ($0.014 per search query on top)
Code example
Best practices
- Always pass
imageSizeandaspectRatio; otherwise the model picks the ratio and the token-based cost is unpredictable - Set the timeout to 360 seconds: most 4K requests in our tests took 30–50 seconds, a few over 2 minutes
- Never hard-code
parts[0]: iterate overpartsand take the last one withinlineData - Migrating from Nano Banana 2 takes two steps: change the model name and switch 512 to 1K; request and response formats are unchanged
Pricing and Availability
Pricing
APIYI offers both per-request and token-based billing; choose the billing mode when you create a token:
With token-based billing, the cost per image varies. Here are the actual charges for 60 token-billed production requests on 2026-10-07:
Model prices are aligned with the official website and may change with it; the table above is for reference only — the Model Pricing tab in the top navigation is authoritative: Model Pricing.
Default (1.0x) and NB-Enterprise (1.4x fallback channel). Nano Banana 2 remains available at the same price ($0.055 per request).
Stack it with top-up bonuses
These prices can be combined with APIYI’s top-up bonus for an even lower actual cost; see Top-up Promotions.Summary and Recommendations
Nano Banana 2.1 is an upgrade where quality goes up and price comes down: its Arena scores beat Google’s own Pro, while Google’s image output price is halved. On APIYI, a 4K image costs just $0.05 per request — less than Nano Banana 2’s $0.055.- New projects: use Nano Banana 2.1
- Already on Nano Banana 2: switching is worth it — change the model name and drop 512
- Need 512px thumbnails: stay on Nano Banana 2, or use Nano Banana 2 Lite
- Want the top of the leaderboard: compare the
gpt-image-2.5models, which cost more
Sources (retrieved 2026-10-07): Google Gemini API model and pricing pages
ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models/gemini-nano-banana-2.1 and ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing; deprecation schedule ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/deprecations; Arena text-to-image and image-editing leaderboards arena.ai/leaderboard (data as of 2026-10-06); APIYI pricing API and production gateway tests (2026-10-07).